Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker Login Fail after daily Update

[Moreno]

Hi

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Vincent Danen <vdanen@mandriva.com> wrote:
> * [2008-05-20 12:01:04 +0200] Moreno wrote:
>
>>>>> > After the daily update of my Cooker machine all attempts to make a
>>>>> > login fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is which urpmi have installed the packages and generated 2
>>>>> rpmnew files but it do not have signalled this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have replaced the /etc/login-def and /etc/pam.d/system-auth file
>>>>> with the .rpmnew file and all return to work normally.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have msec installled? See
>>>> <https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=29719>.
>>>
>>> That's not strictly related to msec, other config tools can modify pam
>>> config files.
>>>
>>> But is it normal that pam_unix does not work anymore in the config
>>> file? In the initial plan, it was said that pam_tcb was backwards
>>> compatible with pam_unix, it does not seem to be the case...
>>>
>>> Anyway, I don't think we should force migration to pam_tcb in %post,
>>> there's no real reason to handle .rpmnew files differently in this
>>> package if pam_tcb is backwards compatible as you claim.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier Blin (blino) - Mandriva
>>>
>>
>> These are my configurations file
>
> /etc/login.def should still work even without the TCB stuff.  login.def
> is used when creating new accounts, so shouldn't prevent you from
> logging in.  That's strictly pam-related.
>
> Did you make changes to /etc/login.def?  I didn't think too many people
> would have made changes to that file so I didn't worry about doing some
> kind of "migration magic" in the spec to handle it, as I did with
> system-auth (granted, that was in a pam update that came a few hours
> after the original tcb-aware one came out).
>
> --
> Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
>

No i do not have do any modification inside these configuration file.

I have updated an other machine with the same effect.


Bye Bye, Moreno