Mandriva

Return to the main archive index.

Custom Search

Mandriva Linux Archives: cooker@mandrivalinux.org

Mandriva Linux: cooker@mandrivalinux.org


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


* [2008-05-20 12:40:22 -0300] Gustavo De Nardin (spuk) wrote:

* Olivier Blin <blino@mandriva.com> [2008-05-20 10:57 +0200]:
"Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)" <gustavodn@mandriva.com> writes:

> * Moreno <moreno.mg@gmail.com> [2008-05-20 08:37 +0200]:
>> Hi
>> >> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Moreno <moreno.mg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > After the daily update of my Cooker machine all attempts to make a login fail.
>> >> The problem is which urpmi have installed the packages and generated 2
>> rpmnew files but it do not have signalled this.
>> >> I have replaced the /etc/login-def and /etc/pam.d/system-auth file
>> with the .rpmnew file and all return to work normally.
>
> Do you have msec installled? See
> <https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=29719>.


That's not strictly related to msec, other config tools can modify pam
config files.

The problem here is Msec changing it without my knowledge. I would watch, or at least be more wary, for trouble, if (I knew) my pam config was modified.

Seriously? msec is changing pam configs? For crying out loud...


But is it normal that pam_unix does not work anymore in the config
file? In the initial plan, it was said that pam_tcb was backwards
compatible with pam_unix, it does not seem to be the case...

Anyway, I don't think we should force migration to pam_tcb in %post,
there's no real reason to handle .rpmnew files differently in this
package if pam_tcb is backwards compatible as you claim.

I'm not sure I upgraded to that version of pam. I'll check later at home. I think I'll put the old pam and config back and watch how %post handles it.

Ok. I tested it quite suitably (well, the scripting additions I added) so it should do the right thing. I'm waiting for my local cooker mirror to sync up to make sure that the script upgrade goes 100%. It should leave the original file as system-auth.original.

--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/

Attachment: pgp00079.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Date Index | Thread Index