Mandriva

Return to the main archive index.

Custom Search

Mandriva Linux Archives: cooker@mandrivalinux.org

Mandriva Linux: cooker@mandrivalinux.org


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


"Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)" <gustavodn@mandriva.com> writes:

> * Moreno <moreno.mg@gmail.com> [2008-05-20 08:37 +0200]:
>> Hi
>> 
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Moreno <moreno.mg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > After the daily update of my Cooker machine all attempts to make a login fail.
>> 
>> The problem is which urpmi have installed the packages and generated 2
>> rpmnew files but it do not have signalled this.
>> 
>> I have replaced the /etc/login-def and /etc/pam.d/system-auth file
>> with the .rpmnew file and all return to work normally.
>
> Do you have msec installled? See
> <https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=29719>.

That's not strictly related to msec, other config tools can modify pam
config files.

But is it normal that pam_unix does not work anymore in the config
file? In the initial plan, it was said that pam_tcb was backwards
compatible with pam_unix, it does not seem to be the case...

Anyway, I don't think we should force migration to pam_tcb in %post,
there's no real reason to handle .rpmnew files differently in this
package if pam_tcb is backwards compatible as you claim.

-- 
Olivier Blin (blino) - Mandriva



Date Index | Thread Index