Mandrake Linux Archives: cooker-amd64@linux-mandrake.com
Mandrake Linux: cooker-amd64@linux-mandrake.com
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Duncan
- Subject: [cooker-amd64] 2.6 custom kernel, now compiled and working here, but issues..
- Date: 28 Jan 2004 10:34:55 -0000
As the title says, for those like me that go reading the next message without looking at the title <g>.. I now have a 2.6 custom (naturally, since I've not found an amd64 Mdk kernel package out yet) kernel up and running, and will post this using it, which is significant in itself since that means X as well is stable enough to use, on the 2.6 kernel. However, some issues to report, and questions to ask.. The source was from the Mdk kernel srpm: kernel-2.6.2-0.rc1.1mdk. 1) Question: Kernel package differences What are the current differences between the regular 2.6.x mdk kernel, the mdk-tmb version, and the vanilla Linus/AM version? Now that I started with the std mdk one and know SOME 2.6 kernel works, I'll try the others and probably eventually settle on the LT/AM kernel, unless there are patches in the others I want/need. (I've not yet attempted anything other than official vanilla kernel upgrade patches, on the kernel, 2.4 OR 2.6, so am not yet considering applying individual kernel patches.) Extra credit for anyone that can explain the various other kernels, such as the mm tree, and others, and what particular patches and goals they emphasize, as well. 2) Question: Compile process warnings, specifically cast With the 2.6 kernel compile process far quieter than 2.4, any warnings stick out far more. In particular, I noticed several cast pointer/init warnings, which could be VERY significant for AMD64. Are all these warnings critical bugs waiting to cause a kernel panic, or are there cases where they can be safely ignored without issue? Should I be sure and report those warnings as a bug? If so, where? File them in MDK-bugzilla? Send them to the official kernel folks (or module/subsystem maintainer)? Just post them here and ask how serious they are? Mail them to GB? <g> 2a) Question: Compile process warning error dump? Does there happen to be a convenient dump of such warnings from a compile, that I can scrape them out of, or do I need to redirect the compile output to a file or screen-scrape manually? (That one feels newbie-ish, but hey.. <g>) 3) Bug: Bootsplash I attempted to configure bootsplash, but had to disable that, as it caused compile errors. Known issue? More detail needed? Where to file? 3a) Question: Bootsplash Where is this used? Does bootsplash cover up boot messages? (If so, better to have it off anyway, here.) 4) Question: Graphics/Logos Where do the CONFIG_LOGOx settings get used? Only in the bootsplash I couldn't activate? Any way to view the logos and see what they look like so I can more intelligently say which I want included, if any? Is the only use of these to cover up the booting info? (If so, I'll disable this and forget about it, as I LIKE seeing those messages!) 5) Bug: ReiserFS I'm using reiserfs (3, not 4, yet..). Attempting to compile without additional attributes enabled produced an error. As above, known issue? Where do I file? 6) Bug: Initrd (InitRamFS??) Make install created an initrd (initramfs, now, I guess??), and configured it into lilo.conf, even tho I had reiserfs and etc compiled into the kernel itself and didn't NEED such a complication. However, worse than that, with the initramfs/initrd configured in lilo.conf, the kernel wouldn't boot. When I removed that line and reran lilo, the kernel booted fine, without the unneeded initrd/initramfs. What's up with that? If it's not going to boot with it, but boots without it just fine, it's a bug to have it used. (Note again that I'm using reiserfs, not Mdk's default ext3, and this could be reiserfs specific.) Again, is this MDK or Linux/kernel? Where to file the bug? 7) Issue: Mouse I read the previous about mousedev, and ensured it was configured, so the mouse works, but buttons 4/5, the scrolling functionality, does not. Hints? Bug? Config issue on my end? 8) Issue: AMD8111/i810 built-in audio PCM My AMD8111/i810 audio mixer works, as the sliders and mutes for line-in and headphones (which for some reason work as master on this board, master does nothing) function, but PCM doesn't. I did notice an error when attempting to init ALSA during boot, that I'll have to look into, but anyone else already had this issue and done my research for me? 9) Bug: UDev package This isn't specifically kernel /package/ related, but close enough, since udev itself is kernel 2.6 related. The Mdk Udev package requires kernel 2.6.0, apparently specifically. Thus, not only can it not be installed pre-2.6 kernel (as can module-init-tools and sysfsutils), but it won't install with 2.6.2-rc1, either, at least not without forcing it. I'm not caught up on the cooker list, as I'd let it go for some time since amd64 wasn't synced, but now that it's syncing (and hopefully not sinking <g>), I'm trying to catch up again. Anyway, because I'm not there yet, I don't know if this is a known issue with that package, perhaps already fixed in a new one not yet on ported to amd64, or not. (GRR!! I keep trying to scroll and issue #7 is frustrating me! You don't realize how dependent you've gotten on a feature like that until it disappears! <g>) 10) Question: CONFIG_PREEMPT I've read that this isn't considered stable, just yet. How unstable is it supposed to be? (I have it compiled in, and no probs yet, but I'm not running under serious load, yet, either.) Anyway.. it's cool to be running 2.6, now, tho if I can't fix issues 7 and 8 I'll not be running it full time. Good job, Mdk, kernel, and related utilities folks, developers, packagers, and previous brave cookerite testers! You've made the upgrade not half as hard as I was afraid it might be! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
- Replies:
- Re: [cooker-amd64] 2.6 custom kernel, now compiled and working here, but issues..
- From: Pierre-Olivier Gaillard
- Re: [cooker-amd64] 2.6 custom kernel, now compiled and working here, but issues..
- From: Gwenole Beauchesne
- Re: [cooker-amd64] 2.6 custom kernel, now compiled and working here, but issues..
- Prev by Date: Re: [cooker-amd64] Proposed A64 platform for Mandrake A64
- Next by Date: Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Previous by thread: [cooker-amd64] Updated NVidia AMD64 driver
- Next by thread: Re: [cooker-amd64] 2.6 custom kernel, now compiled and working here, but issues..
- Index(es):
