Mandrake Linux Archives: cooker-amd64@linux-mandrake.com
Mandrake Linux: cooker-amd64@linux-mandrake.com
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Duncan
- Subject: [cooker-amd64] Re: Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Date: 25 Jan 2004 16:03:00 -0000
Stefan van der Eijk posted <4013CA8C.5000904@eijk.nu>, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:54:20 +0100: > Even if you *do* find a way to sneak one by them, you'll get your arse > toasted in the mailinglist. Blaming you for everyhting that ever went > wrong even though the *technical* truth is different. But that doesn't > matter for them, even though the package was already broken, you > uploaded it a 2nd time, and get blamed for everything. [] > Conclusion: just forget KDE, for now. Saving the rest to reply to later, but thought I'd reply to this. It's easy to get impatient and call names and blame.. but it doesn't really help. Along about my 8th grade year, my dad (a teacher and school administrator) took over directorship of a Navajo mission in New Mexico. The stories I could tell.. but what relates to this discussion is one of the words of wisdom the departing director left with my dad, as the three of us toured the mission, thus, in my hearing. He said that the most difficult part of being director wasn't the money, or the regulations, or the kids, or any of that. Rather, it was getting all the staff to work together, and the job of having to KEEP them working together, even amongst personal dislikes and sometimes outright hostility. That was many years ago, but obviously, it left a big impression on me. At times like this, I remember it. Us geek types may be harder than most to keep working together, because we tend to be used to being the smartest and most technically inclined of most of our social groups, in many cases. Thus, we tend to have a way of believing that what we think about something is THE way it must be done. This sort of gut belief obviously can tend to lead to friction. I'm not specifically defending Laurent, the person who is, after all, the Mdk KDE team, basically. However, he's the one they've got, at this point, and we work with him on KDE or don't work at all, basically, regardless of his social or personal qualities, good or bad. Also, he's pretty good technically, it would appear, and that we are lucky to have, regardless of his ability to work with the team. Perhaps we'd be better off with a different person with a bit better team skills, regardless of technical ability. That could be argued. However, right now, we have what we have, it comes with the Mandrake KDE packages, and as long as we choose Mandrake and KDE, we choose to work with him, like it or not. Thus, my attitude is.. make the best of the situation. If it eventually proves unworkable, either I will move on, or he will, but for now, we've both chosen Mandrake, he as employee assigned to those packages, me as user of them, so I either learn to live with it, or move elsewhere, and at this point, living with it is easier than pulling up and moving elsewhere, so I might as well enjoy it as best I can. Truth is, I know *I'M" not ready to take on the position, and tho there are others that might be, I can't say how well they'd work converting KDE's packages to Mandrake's policies either, if they were stuck with the ENTIRE job, so I'm not ready to say I'd prefer someone else in the position, teamwork or no teamwork. Besides, it's not MY call. So, I'll let the Mdk administrative team do what it does, and get back to this task that seems I'm ever-so-slow at getting anywhere with, that of learning enough about Linux, and here RPM and Mandrake specifically, to be of more than occasional help from the sidelines, as seems to be the case, now. I'm learning, but it's EVER so slow a process! I guess that's why I've been a bit hesitant to get an account on the wiki or with Mdk, as you suggested elsewhere in the reply. I don't understand even HALF of the RPM packaging process, yet, and really don't know what I could DO at that level, yet. On the bright side, that's one of the good things about this whole AMD64 thing, despite the frustration. I'm HAVING to learn a bit, in ordered to get stuff to work, which is why I deliberately decided to jump into it so early, after all, rather than waiting another upgrade cycle. It has FORCED the learning process, sometimes a bit faster than I'd like, but that's what I WANTED, after all, and why I got into it. I don't understand packaging yet, but I'm closer now, than I was even when I wrote that frustrated message a week or whatever it was ago, thanks to your pointing out to me your logs, and what I was able to learn browsing through them. and FAR closer now, than I was before I switched to AMD64, when I'd seen you guys discussing RPM macros, but hadn't ever actually SEEN one yet. <g> It's coming. It's just TAKING forever, or seems to be, sometimes. <g> Then again, I realize how far I've come in the two years on Linux-Mandrake, and that I'm roughly where I was after a decade on MSWormOS, and I realize I'm making progress AFTER all. It's just that Linux is such a **BIG** subject! <g> (I did get a bit more time this week, and have spent a good share of it learning more about kernels, and looking at upgrading to 2.6 here. I wasn't aware of the 2.6 Mdk kernels for amd64 you mentioned, so was getting back into compiling my own 2.4 kernel, in prep for doing the same with 2.6. However, it's back to work again later this afternoon, but hopefully I'll have some extra time again next week.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
- Replies:
- Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- From: Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- References:
- [cooker-amd64] using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- From: Arie Folger
- [cooker-amd64] Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- From: Duncan
- Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- From: Stefan van der Eijk
- [cooker-amd64] using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Prev by Date: Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Next by Date: [cooker-amd64] Re: Re: SATA problem
- Previous by thread: Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Next by thread: Re: [cooker-amd64] Re: Re: using and compiling rpms not specifically put together for amd64
- Index(es):
